Don't be lazy! Use the right language on social media

December 15, 2009

Dont be lazy! Use the right language on social media

Organic PR is all about taking the everyday opportunities in your business and leveraging them through different channels, not least social media.

Often clients worry that using lots of different channels will mean they overkill their customers. However, setting media mavens like Morgan PR aside, very few of your prospective customers will be using lots of different social media channels.

They may be on Twitter or Facebook and perhaps LinkedIn – but relatively few will be thriving on all three. Now effective marketing and PR means effective targeting – so you need to use the language they will recognise and preferably respond to.

Now it has become easier than ever before to simultaneously publish on different platforms it has also led to some of the businesses promoting themselves through social media to adopt a frankly lazy approach of publishing the same message across different platforms.

Take our preferred Twitter tool Tweetdeck, in common with other platforms it allows you to simultaneous tweet, update your facebook status and tell LinkedIn what you are doing.

Now if neutral language is used you could get away with this approach, but that will mean you are not exploiting language that is unique to each specific channel.

For example, LinkedIn with its focus firmly on business users drives less traffic to the Morgan PR website than Twitter or Facebook, but those originating from LinkedIn spend longer on the website and read more pages than the other two sources of traffic.

So just imagine for a moment that you have never been exposed to Twitter and you merrily use LinkedIn... then suddenly one of your contacts begins to update using RT (retweet) and the #hashtags that map trending topics on Twitter. It would be akin to finding a passage of latin in your tabloid of choice and would jar. The same goes with facebook where most updates are normally longer than Twitter’s 140 character limit.

Put simply by saving a few moments be publishing the same message across all platforms there is a real risk that you actually diminish their value and the impact they will have, ultimately reducing your return on investment in social media.

As we tell delegates on our Twitter Workshop (there are a few spaces left on our January Twitter Workshop in Newbury) quality and consistency will always win out over quantity. Simply editing your message to fit each platform and then publishing will stop the confusion in the minds of your prospective customers and that has to be good for your business.


Comments

Graham Jones said...

Targeting - if only more people were aware that messages only work if they are received. And they are only received if they are targeted correctly.

But it gets worse online than merely Twitter or LinkedIn etc. There is plenty of software which will automate your comments on blogs, allowing people to write non-targeted generalities which get them nowhere.

Online, as offline, the best way of achieving success is by planning and hard work. Anyone who thinks all you need is software to make it easy has failed to understand the essential basis of communication.

Oh....by the way....this is a unique comment, not prepared by any software program and not automated in any way, any way, any way, any way, any way....whoops looks like the program got stuck there.....!

Graham Jones, 15/12/2009 11:53
www.grahamjones.co.uk/
www.grahamjones.co.uk/blog.html
www.twitter.com/grahamjones
www.linkedin.com/in/grahamjones
Nigel Morgan said...

Delicious contribution there Graham!

What do you think the chances are that when I tweet about this, some of my 5,000 plus followers will merrily retweet it to LinkedIn and Facebook without spotting the irony, or indeed reading the post?

Naturally I shall be posting it individually to each of the different social media channels we use!

Nigel Morgan, 15/12/2009 12:34
Katharine Robinson said...

I am especially irritated when I see ReTweets displayed in Facebook and LinkedIn. I instantly feel that the people making these status updates value their Facebook friends and LinkedIn connections less than their followers on twitter.

I get the impression that some people set up their twitter streams to update everywhere and then leave the other networks forgotten. This might well be the case, but I don't want to know about it.

I am much more tolerant of the #in and #fb hashtags. When I see these, I know that someone was updating twitter and thought what they had to say would benefit those in another network. The Facebook and LinkedIn networks are still in the mind of the person doing the updates.

As long as the updates are human, they can have value.

Katharine Robinson, 15/12/2009 16:24
www.sourceress.co.uk
www.twitter.com/TheSourceress
www.linkedin.com/in/katharinerobinson
Carolyne Wahlen said...

I agree with Katharine that it sometimes feels that the updates are too automated. It also depends on what level of updates you expect from what software. An hourly/half-hourly update from Twitter is acceptable and "believable", the same from LinkedIn just doesn't fit with the different market connected to you.

Oops, just noticed that my LinkedIn updates are doing exactly that because of the #in, need to practice what I preach! Off to un-hash tag my tweets!

Carolyne Wahlen, 17/12/2009 10:18
www.gaphr.co.uk
www.twitter.com/preventativehr
www.linkedin.com/in/carolynewahlen
Richard Charon said...

Sound advice here,thanks Nigel. I obviously have much still to learn, esp re #tags. Strangely enough, I only revisited my Linkedin account for the first time in at least a month, yesterday.

Why? Well it produces far fewer two-way conversations for me than Twitter. Perhaps I need to revisit my approach to Linkedin.

PS whilst writing is there a way to transfer from Blogger.com to Wordpress or would I need to start from scatch and refer/link to older blogposts on blogger.com from a new Wordpress site?

Thanks

Richard Charon, 22/12/2009 12:56
www.newburydentist.co.uk
www.newburydentist.blogspot.com
zuuMedia Swindon said...

Great article. Targetting the best way to get a 2 way conversation going.

Richard, wordpress has a built in import tool which can import from blogspot, amongst others.

zuuMedia Swindon, 04/01/2010 20:45
www.swindon.zuumedia.com
www.swindon.zuumedia.com
www.twitter.com/zuumediaswindon
Jane Penson said...

I have just taken advantage of snow-cancelled activities to read the blogs of my LinkedIn contacts.

Fascinating. Really, some people "get it" in the way that they write interestingly about what they know and care about, and others just bang on.

I want to know more about them - that's why I read their blog. I don't want to see their tweets there - that's what tweetdeck is for. A hard sell will switch me off straight away too, I agree with you Nigel, by all means use multiple channels but to make good use of each channel, everything needs to be targeted. These social media channels are beginning to come of age as people realise that there is no magic bullet. A bit like websites 15 or so years ago.

Best wishes Jane

Jane Penson, 08/01/2010 11:02
www.grammartogo.co.uk
www.grammartogo.co.uk/blog
Dan Knowlson said...

Great post Nigel, and some great comments too.

When I first started to use Twitter, I set it up to feed all tweets into Facebook. But after getting several comments from friends & family on how odd my FB comments were I realised that it might not be the best thing to do.

So now I now longer link the two. I do link some networks together and do use Ping.fm to post to multiple networks (inc FB & Twitter) at once; but only occasionally and only with messages that will look right on all of those networks.

It's a balancing act, I feel to keep messages relevant to the network they are posted on, while optimising my time and effort. I'm always looking for hints and tips on best practice and being more effective in my communications.

Dan Knowlson, 11/01/2010 16:09
www.lightbeingcreations.co.uk
www.twitter.com/DanKnowlson
www.uk.linkedin.com/in/lightbeingcreations

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website

Blog

Twitter

LinkedIn

Submit Comment